Joined
·
3,055 Posts
Just throwing this out here to see if there is any interest for some "fun" fantasy golf.
Here's how it works.
From the listed field you pick 3 main players, and two alternates. Just say you picked Woods, Kaymer, and Westwood as my three main players and two alternates are (1.) Mickelson, and (2.) Vegas.
All picks have to be in before the start of the tournament. We seem to have a few different time zones represented on this forum, but that should not be a problem.
Alternates can only be used if one of my three main players have to leave the tournament for any reason except for disqualification, or missing the cut. Example; if Kaymer were to be eaten by an alligator, I could insert my first alternate Mickelson in his place. If Kaymer was -8 before he became dinner, and Mickelson finished the tournament at -7, Mickelson's score would count since Kaymer did not finish the tournament.
If Woods were to miss the cut @ +1, Kaymer finished the tournament @ -5, and Westwood finished the tournament @ -10, my score for the week would be -14. I couldn't use an alternate's score for Woods because he missed the cut. If another forum member's players finished at -22, I lost by 7 strokes.
Weekly scores are cumulative until the last major of the year is played. At the end of the last major, the over all winner is the forum member with the lowest number. It's up to each member to keep their score.
Simple Rules
(1) alternates can't be used to replace DQ'd, and/or main players who miss the cut.
(2) Also, alternates need to be designated "first" and "second".
(3) Only the players (members' picks) who finish the tournament on Sunday can have their scores used.
(4) All member's picks have to be posted prior to the start of the tournament.
That's four rules, which is enough. If some issue were to come up, the forum members participating in that tournament could work it out. That, or the forum members could designate a Fantasy league Commissioner who could make a binding ruling based on the facts. Member's scores are based on their players scores, so there is not much to debate when it comes to scoring.
Quoting FrogsHair here just putting it all in one post.
Here's how it works.
From the listed field you pick 3 main players, and two alternates. Just say you picked Woods, Kaymer, and Westwood as my three main players and two alternates are (1.) Mickelson, and (2.) Vegas.
All picks have to be in before the start of the tournament. We seem to have a few different time zones represented on this forum, but that should not be a problem.
Alternates can only be used if one of my three main players have to leave the tournament for any reason except for disqualification, or missing the cut. Example; if Kaymer were to be eaten by an alligator, I could insert my first alternate Mickelson in his place. If Kaymer was -8 before he became dinner, and Mickelson finished the tournament at -7, Mickelson's score would count since Kaymer did not finish the tournament.
If Woods were to miss the cut @ +1, Kaymer finished the tournament @ -5, and Westwood finished the tournament @ -10, my score for the week would be -14. I couldn't use an alternate's score for Woods because he missed the cut. If another forum member's players finished at -22, I lost by 7 strokes.
Weekly scores are cumulative until the last major of the year is played. At the end of the last major, the over all winner is the forum member with the lowest number. It's up to each member to keep their score.
Simple Rules
(1) alternates can't be used to replace DQ'd, and/or main players who miss the cut.
(2) Also, alternates need to be designated "first" and "second".
(3) Only the players (members' picks) who finish the tournament on Sunday can have their scores used.
(4) All member's picks have to be posted prior to the start of the tournament.
That's four rules, which is enough. If some issue were to come up, the forum members participating in that tournament could work it out. That, or the forum members could designate a Fantasy league Commissioner who could make a binding ruling based on the facts. Member's scores are based on their players scores, so there is not much to debate when it comes to scoring.
Quoting FrogsHair here just putting it all in one post.